Editorial the target
Fewer people do everything
Defending the real Star
Jan. 16 strike vote
Bulletin #15 (Jan. 14)
Bulletin #14 (Jan. 14)
Bulletin #12 (Jan. 10)
Bulletin #11 (Jan. 8)
Bulletin #10 (Jan. 7)
Bulletin #9 (Dec. 27)
Bulletin #8 (Dec. 10)
Bulletin #7 (Nov. 23)
Bulletin #6 (Nov. 5)
Bulletin #5 (Oct. 30)
Bulletin #4 (Oct. 17)
Bulletin #3 (Oct. 12)
One big Metroland
Newsroom under siege
Every loyal Star employee is a company target in this round of bargaining. But no group is being singled out for as much nasty business as the award-winning bunch
in Editorial (well, Pre-Press has a case too, but we'll leave that for another day).
We're not sure the company has missed any opportunity to try and diminish the
newsroom. The bargaining agenda would radically damage what it means to be a
journalist at our paper. Take a deep breath: Here's just a partial list of what the
company still has on the bargaining table:
- Sunday pay: Gone. Period.
- Overtime: Double time gone.
- Overtime: Per-shift overtime gone. Instead we'd have weekly overtime,
which means a 12-hour shift could be followed by several shorter shifts, so
the company could avoid paying any overtime at all. And get this: The first 5
hours of overtime a week would be paid at straight time, not time and a half.
You'd only get time and a half for hours beyond 40 hours a week.
- Schedules: Posted 2 weeks in advance, not 4. Penalty for changing shifts
without notice cut to 1 hour's pay.
- Night shift premium: Would only apply to those scheduled to work past 8
- Merit pay: The company would be able to reduce or eliminate existing merit
- Two-ways: Removal of the 10% wage premium and company cars for
- New hires: No Star pension. Seniority would no longer determine the order
of layoffs; skill sets would.
All of this stuff would apply to other departments too, as would many other
attempted company takeaways. But the above hits Editorial wallets in particular.
We're talking thousands of dollars in lost wages for many people.
But wait, there's more...
Jacks & Jills of all trades
The company also wants to reclassify (almost) everybody not in support roles into
four new jobs. Here they are: Team Editor. Page Editor. Editor. Journalist.
Team Editor we already know about, but would include all department deputies.
Page Editor we already know about, but would include all section editors.
Editor would be all copy editors.
Journalist would be the new job title of everyone who "generates content" -
everyone from editorial writers to photographers to reporters to columnists to all
Now, the company says nobody in an existing higher category - say editorial writer
or columnist - will have to take a cut in base pay, or lose any future base wage
But wait, there's worse to come...
Everybody a 2-way, 3-way, 4-way
These new job classifications, including Team and Page Editor, will each get a new
job description. And those job descriptions will say people should be able to do
everything in both the print and digital world. So the new Journalist should be able to interview people and write stories; shoot video; shoot stills; record audio tape;
produce Flash and other graphics ... on it goes. Same for the editing jobs: Those
people are expected to be as fluent in the digital and other high-tech skill worlds as
But no protection
As you should expect, we have told the company that people must be protected in
their current jobs. A reporter must not be forced to take video or stills, for example. A
photographer cannot be forced to do an interview, for example. The company has
flatly refused. They say a year or two at most is all the protection time they'll give
existing staff, before this new "jack of all trades, master of none" journalism world
But wait, there's more ...
Fewer jobs, too
Freelance: All restrictions on freelance inside the GTA would vanish, putting the job
security of photographers, reporters and others at immediate risk.
Editors: We know the company wants to reduce the number of production staff: A
new CCI tool called NewsGate, for example, will in a year allow any one editor at
any Torstar newsroom, sitting at any one computer, to place the same story on
different pages and websites for every Torstar newspaper - video, photo
enhancement and graphics, too! The company says it has no plans at this time to
use NewsGate or other such things to reduce staff - although Torstar "efficiency
experts" and outside consultants who specialize in "business process reengineering"
are involved in NewsGate's implementation alone.
Even more ...
We haven't even told you yet about the nasty company plans on pensions, benefits
and much else that impact every Star employee. Stayed tuned for our next bulletin.
The future Star
We believe in a future with - and of - a newspaper, both print and online, that
continues to protect the precious Star brand by not preaching but actually doing
excellent journalism. This is not the company vision. The company would diminish
specialists and promote generalists - while paying less. This is the world of
Canadian Press, the Toronto Sun ... and Metroland. We didn't come to Canada's
No. 1 daily to be part of this.
Calling all members: Our strike vote meeting begins Wed. Jan. 16 at 5 p.m. at the
Westin Harbour Castle, across the street from 1 Yonge.
Guild Bargaining Committee
Unit Chair: Maureen Dawson
Editorial: Dan Smith and Valerie Hauch (alternate)
Circulation: Steve Gjorkes and Jeff Bodrucky (alternate)
Finance: Cathie Nichols and Dawn Armstrong (alternate)
Advertising: Elizabeth Marzari and Dijana Maderic (alternate)
Thestar.com: Craig Wattie and Tony Camara (alternate)
Pre-Press: Lester Veszlenyi and Lorraine Wohlgemuth (alternate)